At the end of January, WatchPro attempted to chart a course through the wreckage of this year’s exhibition calendar, noting the fragmentation that has led all of the major watch groups and biggest brands holding different events.
Even this effort was quickly out of date as Grand Seiko had cancelled its Tokyo Summit by the following week.
Rolex/Tudor, LVMH, Swatch Group, Richemont, Movado, Fossil, Breitling, Audemars Piguet, Grand Seiko, Kering and many others are refusing to come together into one, or even two, major trade shows, leaving retailers, consumers and press trawling the world for the first five months of the year to see the 2020 collections.
Every one of the groups and brands will tell you they will be putting on a fantastic show, but none appear to be listening to the needs of their key retail partners.
So WatchPro decided to do the work for them, and surveyed 127 of the most senior executives in the British watch industry. These are owners of major independent stores; bosses at mini multiples representing the likes of Rolex, Patek Philippe, TAG Heuer and Breitling; and senior buyers from the major groups including The Watches of Switzerland Group and Bucherer.
It was an anonymous survey, and we will publish the full results in the first week of March. But, to get the ball rolling, we thought it interesting to share some of the opinions that came back.
It is worth noting that these are UK retailers, who can catch a budget airline to any city in Europe. The same survey of retailers in the United States — and WatchPro has spoken to many about this issue — might have elicited even more forthright reactions.
“I really believe the arrogance of the Swiss watch making industry will harm their and our business long term,” said one respondent, who has a suggestion for the brands and exhibition organisers: “One important show a year guarantees the most senior and important buying and selling directors make themselves available and attend the five days that become vital to seeing the new ranges.”
“I have personally been asked to go to Milan for 3 days, Zurich for 2 days, Basel for 2 days, Dubai for 3 days and London twice for overnighters for the brands that we carry. I have no desire or want to travel or pay costs that often and be away from my business for that period of time,” the retailer continues.
“Come on – its time for the industry to come together, bash some heads together and build a single future show with ALL the brands exhibiting their products to the convenience of their clients – us the retailers,” the argument concludes.
Those views were echoed by another independent for the leading luxury brands. “Geneva and Basel are now too late in the year. The previous dates did suit us and we were used to this timetable. This years arrangements for UK customers in Geneva makes life difficult, requiring two trips to Switzerland which for us means a lot of time lost travelling and two weekends away in succession.”
The time and the cost of attending multiple shows is a recurring theme. “The whole trade believes we get stung with the increase in the hotel rates for Basel. Taxi fares are crazy, the charges for a bottle of water are unbelievable, that’s why we all at the end day end up in the local pub complaining about the prices , but not the 🍺. [Basel] is too expensive.”
This retailer at least had something positive to say about the Geneva show. “I find SIHH a far better fair, all done in one day; brilliant setting,” he said.